Wisconsin’s mandatory minimum sentencing laws, like those in many states, are rigid in situations that require individualized judgment. Judges are elected to weigh evidence, culpability, risk, rehabilitation, and mitigation, yet mandatory minimums often prevent sentences that reflect the specific facts of a case. That rigidity becomes more concerning when prosecutorial discretion is applied unevenly, as seen in Ozaukee County, Wisconsin under District Attorney Ben Lindsey, with young defendants receiving the harshest outcomes for non‑contact digital conduct while adult authority figures accused of hands‑on behavior receive more flexible charging decisions.