Recent News

SORNA Isn’t the Whole Story: Why Federal vs. State Rules Leave Families Confused
Reentry, SORNA Michelle Friedman Reentry, SORNA Michelle Friedman

SORNA Isn’t the Whole Story: Why Federal vs. State Rules Leave Families Confused

Families face a maze of conflicting federal and state sex‑offender registration rules, and this article breaks down the core differences in clear, accessible language. It explains how SORNA’s federal tiers often fail to match state‑level requirements, why this mismatch creates confusion for loved ones, and what families must understand to navigate registration safely and confidently.

Read More
Selective Severity: Inequity and Disproportionate Punishment in Wisconsin

Selective Severity: Inequity and Disproportionate Punishment in Wisconsin

Wisconsin’s mandatory minimum sentencing laws, like those in many states, are rigid in situations that require individualized judgment. Judges are elected to weigh evidence, culpability, risk, rehabilitation, and mitigation, yet mandatory minimums often prevent sentences that reflect the specific facts of a case. That rigidity becomes more concerning when prosecutorial discretion is applied unevenly, as seen in Ozaukee County, Wisconsin under District Attorney Ben Lindsey, with young defendants receiving the harshest outcomes for non‑contact digital conduct while adult authority figures accused of hands‑on behavior receive more flexible charging decisions.

Read More